I found this interesting
statement by the DPM/Education Minister [here] “This is a very important discovery that we need to pay attention to
because in our own ministry’s records, even among students not part of the NS, there is a small number of those who have
reached Form Five but still have literacy problems.”
I’m not sure if
he was misquoted but I surely hope he was. Reading the statement makes me wonder
someone with literacy problems can reach form five? By literacy problems I’m
assuming difficulty or maybe even not knowing how to read. If one has
difficulty reading, he/she will also have difficulty understanding and consequently
will have major difficulty passing exams. Before one reaches form five, the
student would have gone through two major national exams; UPSR and PMR. I’m assuming,
a student with the abovementioned problem would end up getting 5Es and 8Fs for
both exams and if they did, how come their school did not take the appropriate
action to remedy the problem?
According to a
report on Star Online (10 January 2012), the Defence Ministry discovered that
about eight per cent of 6,667 National Service trainees from 30 selected camps
nationwide were unable to read and write. 18 year olds who are unable to read
and write! How did they read the letter requesting them to attend NS then? What
about the trainees form other camps not included in the selected 30?
In this day and
age, there is no excuse for a healthy person not being able to read or write. The
system should have detected and rectified the problem much earlier and not
after they have reached eighteen. Didn’t the parents’ notice their children’s inability
to read? What was the purpose of the national exams if it allows illiterate
students to proceed to upper secondary?
Maybe we should
have oral (not the dental type) examinations for 9 year olds to ensure only those
who can read and write proceed to upper primary.
No comments:
Post a Comment